![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Malignancy |
I might have to have a breast remove due to a malignancy, if I do, I am thinking to having both removed.? |
Has anyone one else made this decision. I fear that even if I do not do this all at once, I will always be in fear that it's just a matter of time before I lose the other one. I know Nancy Reagan had both removed and seems to be doing fine. This is a very pain decision and would like your opinion I know I had to talk to my doctors, but I would like to hear about others who have made this type of decision, but thank you for taking the time to answer You need to be discussing this with a trained medical professional. There are several different types of breast cancer, and your physician would be the best resource for help with making this decision. tomorrow I'm having my breast taken off as I found out this past month that I had breast cancer. more and more women are taking it off as when you don't many women have gotton it back in the same breast and lost their life. I have not had to make that decision and follow through, but when I was faced with a lump through the waiting process I had thought about what I would do. My daughter did the same thing but guess what they augmented muscle off of her butt and gave her two new breasts.. They look wonderful and her pain was not that bad. The cut her under her breasts and peeled them up and removed the breasts and replaced them with the Butt muscles and stitched under where you can see the scars and she told us that when they had healed her nipples were sensuous.. Good luck and God bless Grant M in Pennsylvania Even though there is a history of breast cancer in my family on both my mother and father's side, I opted to only have a lumpectomy (a.k.a. partial mastectomy) along with chemo and radiation. If at some time in the future cancer is detected again then I will consider radical mastectomy, but only on the affected breast. I understand that you can lose all affinity for your breasts once one of them give you cancer. I had Stage IV cancer that spread to lungs, liver, and bones, but only had a mastectomy on the side of the cancer. The following factors should help you decide what is best for you... I would have both done but know that ins may/may not pay for removal of both or reconstruction of both. Also know that you can still have a relapse of your breast cancer with both removed. |
| Related information |
There are some links to possibilities below. I cant open them and give you the direct link as my PDF reader isn't working at the moment ...It is not cancerous and because your Mum has it, it does not make her more likely to get other cancers. Take a look at the link below, its has lots of good info. I wish you Mum well. ...It's time to get yourself to a teaching hospital's head and neck service, as the earlier you are diagnosed, the better the outcome will be. Since your lymph nodes aren't normal, you ... I see this often of breast biopsy pathology reports. The most important thing is that this is a benign condition, and many women have it! "Sclerosing adenosis is a benign condition whereby... D When present in large numbers, the may warn of liver damage. Angiokeratomas are an overgrowth of blood vessels and skin cells. Angiomas do not need to be treated unless they bleed or are bother... Obviously if they are not growing than that is a good thing. It could be a variety of things from prominent lymph nodes, to benign lymphocele, to benign lymphoma, but just be thankful they are not... Right, The answer is letter C - Carcinoma. >>90% of malignant kidney tumors is "renal cell carcinoma". >> 90% of all primary malignant tumors arising from the pancreatic g... Blood flow in/out of a mass does not necessarily mean that a mass is malignant. Paradoxically, because of new blood vessel growth on the surface of a tumor, sometimes you see decreased blood flow!... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |