How many suffer macular degeneration? suffer malignant hypertension?

how many out there suffer or know someone who sufferes macular degeneration:

about the disease


http://eyesight.org/Table_of_Contents/ta...


pictorials:


http://eyesight.org/Pictorials/pictorial...


how many are having theirs treated? by medications or has anyone had surgery?

what caused your, your loved one or friends, aquaintances macular degeneration?

mine was caused by malignant hypertension:


http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/...



how many suffer this disease also? not many know about it, from what i gather.. i'm hoping to find out here really what the statistics are with both health problems.

thanks for your time :D

At http://eyesight.org/Pictorials/Pic-Look_... , it states, "Macular degeneration damages and destroys the central vision of up to one in three Americans in their lifetime and has no known cause or cure."

It states "no known cause" and there's a very good reason for it. I do not have macular degeneration... however, you might consider reading my post at http://www.iblindness.org/forum/index.ph...

It may sound too impossible, but there's been a serious flaw at the base of optometry research. You need to read this to get an idea of what has happened.

If you want to see what actually happened 85 years ago, read my post dated February 21, 2007 @ 10:59 am at http://improvingmyeyesight.com/blog/?p=3...

One has to see this in a historical and cultural context to understand it in its entirety.

I know those are pretty long reads, but they are crucial to understanding what's actually going on at the top levels of science.

The leading optometrist at the highly selective Columbia University 85 years ago made a nearly 180 degree turn after 15 years of following optometry doctrine when he found something wrong with a theory from 1855. This theory has kept our doctors from uncovering the truth. This man's name was William Bates. He found that he could reverse not only refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, and so on) but serious eye diseases like blindness, cataracts, macular degeneration, and so many other things. The theory by itself changes everyone's understanding regarding what causes refractive errors and diseases of the eye. Even some modern optometrists (including a Director of Ophthalmologist at New York Medical College) have explicitly stated that Helmholtz's theory has prevented discovery of errors.

I don't know the statistics regarding macular degeneration, but if you think there might even be an ounce of truth to what I'm saying, you can look at my posts and perhaps help yourself by reversing macular degeneration.

To learn more about the Bates Method, you can look at http://www.iblindness.org/ ... start by reading the description on the main page. You can also post at the forums if you have any questions regarding how this method can apply to macular degeneration.

this answer is my question! :( Report It

Mr. Dorkus I have a bone to pick with you! I just read your answers and they are very obnoxious. You don't want people to believe you're obnoxious do you? Report It