![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Cardiac Surgery |
Graft failure after bypass surgery? |
MY GUY had 5 bypasses (quintuple?) in April. He was feeling fine and regaining strength. He began having chest pains about two months after the surgery and went to the cardiologist. He has had an upper GI to rule out hernia, reflux, etc., and EKG, which looked ok. His blood pressure has been good and he has been going to Cardiac Rehab, but the pain still comes and goes. A few days ago, he had another angioplasty, and three of the five grafts had failed. (Some kind of occulusion). He even overheard the Dr say that he could not see them during this procedure. What would make the grafts fail? he is scheduled to have a Myocardial Viability Scan in a week or so and possibly have stents put in or at the worst, another open heart surgery. Needless to say, we both are very scared. Is this very common that the grafts would close up? It happens more than you might think. I worked for a cardiologist who was involved with a study where they did an angiogram on every CABG patient at a one week interval and then a month and then six months. About 20% of the time one or more of the grafts per angiogram had closed at one month. The difference in this phenomenon and that of an acute MI is the graft typically is revascularizing a region that was already being deprived of blood supply prior to the procedure. (So his current situation is no worse than prior to the CABG) In your significant other's case, the fact that the closure is actually causing angina is a good sign that the myocardium is viable. Dead tissue does not hurt. I had known this could happen but I think it's not very common. My CABG was done in Oct. 2006 and I had 5 done myself. I found the following statement in MedlinePlus: kmoc... c_schumacker above is absolutely correct. The closure rate for vein grafts is around 10% a week after surgery and 20% by one year (after that, the closure rate tails off, so the patency rate is 50% at ten years), so 3/5 grafts being closed counts as unlucky, but hardly rare. (Not everybody has symptoms, which is why this fact isn't more widely known.) In fact, in my opinion, the major reason why patients with more severe disease do better with surgery than with stents is that the *arterial* graft (if he had one), which is usually placed to the most important artery supplying 30-50% of the heart, is very unlikely to close down - patency rates are around 90-95% in ten years. |
| Related information |
If your symptoms are not being controlled with medications, then an Ablation procedure should definitely be considered. It can offer a cure, not just a treatment. The risks are now lower with impro... The web gives research statistics, in my opinion you should listen to your cardiologist. No alternate medicine will NOT help you out. ...Here's a link to the actual American Heart Assoc. page with dietary info and links. There is a fad diet floating around out there that claims association with the American Heat Association. Th... It,s good ...Hi debodun. I went through similar circumstances with my father who eventually died of Alzheimer's after 9 years. Honestly, I feel your dreams are normal. Dreams are the way our mind copes and... You should not go on meds for a cholesterol reading of 150...that is actually pretty healthy. Why not just follow a low-cholesterol diet and exercise? It's so much better to get a grip on thin... Well i work in southend general Essex,Mr Kelly is a excellent Cardio consultant.He also works privatly.Also you can look up on hospital websites what are nr you,the websites normally have all the m... The removal of the generator is no big deal. It's the removal of the leads that scares health care practitioners because of the small risk of perforating the heart. Often the leads end up be... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |